Capture Bigfoot In Oklahoma

I am sure that you have heard about the infamous Sasquatch aka Bigfoot. It is said that this creature has been spotted from time to time in various states like Colorado, Oregon, and Texas. But what about Oklahoma? Have there been any sightings of this beast in our state? No one really knows for sure, but I would love to find out! Could the big, hairy legend of Sasquatch and other cryptids be hiding in Oklahoma? That's what some people believe could be happening, given the number of sightings reported in the area.

Oklahoma lawmaker Justin Humphrey, a member of the state's House of Representatives, introduced a bill at the beginning of the year (Jan) to establish a Bigfoot hunting season. The legislator's district in southeastern Oklahoma ranks among the top 10 places for Bigfoot sightings. That's one reason why the local town of Honobia annually hosts a Bigfoot festival to take place this year on October 1 and 2. Rep. Under the legislation, the commission would be required to set annual season dates and create necessary hunting licenses and fees. Humphrey’s proposed legislation, perhaps unsurprisingly, died in committee. While Bigfoot hunting season never came to pass, Rep. Humphrey has at least succeeded in bringing more attention to his neck of the woods.

The legislation was intended to promote tourism in Humphrey’s heavily wooded district in southeast Oklahoma. The area reportedly boasts the ninth most Bigfoot sightings in the world. "Humphrey said he is convinced, after hearing so many stories of the creature, that Oklahoma is a haven for Sasquatch.

Sasquatch is supposedly a large, hairy ape-like creature that live in the forests of North America. It is often described as having a strong smell and making loud screams or howls. There have been many sightings of Bigfoot across North America and other parts of the world. Since the 1950s, there have been many sightings of Bigfoot. Scientists have also been involved in studying Bigfoot evidence.The first extensive scientific study of Bigfoot was conducted by Dr. Grover Krantz, a psychologist from the University of California, Berkeley. In 1967 Krantz conducted a survey on what people believed about Bigfoot before he ever heard any evidence that they actually existed. The results from the survey show that many people had wild ideas about what exactly a Bigfoot was and therefore some people were skeptical about whether or not they were real at all. 

Bigfoot has become popular in pop culture such as movies such as "Harry and the Henderson's" (1987),  "Harry and the Hendersons" (2003 TV Series) etc. These legends of Bigfoot began in the 1800s and they continue to this day. There are many pictures and videos of Bigfoot, but they are usually fake. Also, there are some places where visitors can go to try to spot Bigfoot in the wild. Many people think that these creatures exist while others believe that they are just myths or legends. 

So finally if your a believer or not what is your opinion about the existence of Sasquatch. Bigfoot are also called the Abominable Snowman, Yeti, Yeti of Borneo, Mokausk or Almas. While the name "Bigfoot" is used by most of those who believe that creatures fitting that description exist, it is not a scientific name. 

The argument against Bigfoot goes something like this: If Bigfoot exists then there should be evidence that it does exist. Well that evidence is pretty difficult to come by. The most important point is that the existence of the Sasquatch is not positively proven. Rationally speaking, there are no reasons to think that any of the many stories reported of Bigfoot are true. However, there are plenty of psychological and sociological reasons to support the belief in Bigfoot. When people come across a creature they have no idea how it got there or anything about its origins. They have no rational explanation for it but they have an emotional one so they believe in it

Just because you believe something does not mean that you will accept evidence against your belief. Which is why I use the word "believe" instead of "accept" because it is not something that can be proven through scientific research or even through logic.