Bigfoots Footprints

One thing I always found very perplexing about Bigfoot’s footprints is how they always seem to find generally speaking only a couple tracks. Yes I know the been a couple of cases where they found tracks traveling in a very long distance however that’s a rarity, nine out of 10 times it’s just a couple of tracks that some Bigfoot researcher claims is from Bigfoot. Personally I find this very interesting because considering Bigfoot supposed height and weight that should be a plethora of footprints found. Animal life of all kinds’ sizes and weight often leave multiple tracks which are found all the time and documented in the forest.

Contrary to this Bigfoot investigators often find just a couple of tracks if they’re lucky, generally speaking, most investigators find one or two tracks and then proceed to cast them. I do realize the forest grounds can differ from area to area quite vastly. Many Bigfoot research will say quite simply the ground is too hard for many footprints to be discovered. However, using the same logic oftentimes alleged Bigfoot footprints are found in soft ground such as mud, and even then one, two, or three footprints are found; why is that?

A skeptic will say a hoaxer simply faked three Bigfoot tracks and decided to go on his way while laughing about the whole thing. Personally, speaking an animal that is 8 to 10 feet tall and between 600 to 800 pounds should be footprints everywhere. And not only should there be plenty of footprints but more often than not they should also lead to somewhere. For example, bears are often tracked by the footprints and various other animals of the forest as well. This is why hunters can hunt their prey and eventually find where they hiding or dwelling with other animals of the same species. Now I understand most Bigfoot believers will tell me they’re quite intelligent animals and I can understand that but even the most intelligent people in the world make mistakes eventually.

In fact, some Bigfoot believers even say they are far smarter than any human beings on earth. So how does Bigfoot manage to leave a trail of footprints that lead nowhere? I don’t see a purpose behind that; if there are more than one set of tracks found most researchers will follow them until they come to or end. But oftentimes I find no tracks lead anywhere and the alleged Bigfoot prints all seem to stop and end abruptly leaving no other tracks around whatsoever.

One thing I really do wish to know is why no research, casts, or even photos of Bigfoot’s handprints have ever been found. Personally, I find that very odd, considering the fact many Bigfoot believers claim they are quite big, between 14 to 18 inches long which should also mean the hands are bigger than that. And if this true why hasn’t anyone come across a handprint? Seems like if this creature were real there would be more track evidence left. Researching Bigfoot has been controversial for years and is also very intriguing.

I’ve seen many Bigfoot videos and there are some pretty convincing ones. The problem with Bigfoot videos however is that they can be edited quite easily. In fact, I’ve heard of people being able to create a Bigfoot video fairly easily even with a couple of kids. Now I don’t say this lightly in fact I do believe there is some very interesting Bigfoot video footage out there however they may not all be real.

I’m not a believer or disbeliever of Sasquatch; it is the topic of interest for me. I simply want to know the truth and have my questions answered in a logical and scientific manner especially if you’re trying to convince the world that Bigfoot is real. Bigfoot may in fact be real however before it’s proven to be real we need much more concrete evidence and questions to be answered with facts and not conjecture.